أمثلة سياقية لمعاني كلمة "dualist" الإنجليزية - الإنجليزية

4. In dualist legal systems, domestic law and international law constitute two separate legal systems existing side by side, with international law operating in the international context, and national law operating in the domestic sphere.

25. Supporters of the dualist theory of the relationship between international and domestic law, according to which they constitute two distinct legal systems (although influencing one another and interacting), take a different view of the possibility of the direct application of international law to individuals.

2. The place of international treaty law in municipal law is different in different countries. Commentators have traditionally drawn a distinction between countries with a “monist” legal tradition, and those whose tradition is “dualist”.2

The question of whether an ambiguity exists is frequently controversial, with judges in dualist systems often being wary of drawing on unincorporated treaties.45

The question of whether an ambiguity exists is frequently controversial, with judges in dualist systems often being wary of drawing on unincorporated treaties.45

He observed that articles 12 and 13 had been subjected to considerable criticism and had not been met with general approval. They had been viewed as too conceptual, irrelevant, premised on the dualist position and overly influenced by the distinction between procedure and substance.

2. The place of international treaty law in municipal law is different in different countries. Commentators have traditionally drawn a distinction between countries with a “monist” legal tradition, and those whose tradition is “dualist”.2

Without dwelling on the theory of the transformation of international law into domestic law, upheld by the advocates of the dualist theory, it may be noted that, according to the views of the more radical of the dualists, crimes against international law are the acts of individuals which States, in respect of one another, undertook to regard as crimes, punish those found guilty of their perpetration and cooperate with one another to curb (by exchanges of information, the extradition of criminals and even the establishment of international criminal courts).

Although Israeli Law ascribes to a dualist approach which does not apply international law directly, these instruments are obligatory at the international level and serve at least as guiding principles for the government apparatus (Lapidot, 1990)

2. The place of international treaty law in municipal law is different in different countries. Commentators have traditionally drawn a distinction between countries with a “monist” legal tradition, and those whose tradition is “dualist”.2

25. Supporters of the dualist theory of the relationship between international and domestic law, according to which they constitute two distinct legal systems (although influencing one another and interacting), take a different view of the possibility of the direct application of international law to individuals.

4. In dualist legal systems, domestic law and international law constitute two separate legal systems existing side by side, with international law operating in the international context, and national law operating in the domestic sphere.

4. In dualist legal systems, domestic law and international law constitute two separate legal systems existing side by side, with international law operating in the international context, and national law operating in the domestic sphere.

2. The place of international treaty law in municipal law is different in different countries. Commentators have traditionally drawn a distinction between countries with a “monist” legal tradition, and those whose tradition is “dualist”.2

The question of whether an ambiguity exists is frequently controversial, with judges in dualist systems often being wary of drawing on unincorporated treaties.45

He observed that articles 12 and 13 had been subjected to considerable criticism and had not been met with general approval. They had been viewed as too conceptual, irrelevant, premised on the dualist position and overly influenced by the distinction between procedure and substance.

Without dwelling on the theory of the transformation of international law into domestic law, upheld by the advocates of the dualist theory, it may be noted that, according to the views of the more radical of the dualists, crimes against international law are the acts of individuals which States, in respect of one another, undertook to regard as crimes, punish those found guilty of their perpetration and cooperate with one another to curb (by exchanges of information, the extradition of criminals and even the establishment of international criminal courts).

25. Supporters of the dualist theory of the relationship between international and domestic law, according to which they constitute two distinct legal systems (although influencing one another and interacting), take a different view of the possibility of the direct application of international law to individuals.

The question of whether an ambiguity exists is frequently controversial, with judges in dualist systems often being wary of drawing on unincorporated treaties.45