أمثلة سياقية لمعاني كلمة "dualists" الإنجليزية - الإنجليزية

So—called moderate dualists allow that individuals may, in certain circumstances, be liable to the direct application of norms of international law, become its subjects and directly violate international law by their acts.

The more radical dualists reject this possibility, considering that, since international law only regulates relations between States and that individuals are by their nature incapable of participating in such relations, international law cannot directly regulate the conduct of individuals.

Regardless of this lack of terminological clarity and differences in concepts, both monists and dualists as a whole obviously agree that the term “international crime” can be used to designate the most serious violations of international law committed by States.

Regardless of this lack of terminological clarity and differences in concepts, both monists and dualists as a whole obviously agree that the term “international crime” can be used to designate the most serious violations of international law committed by States.

So—called moderate dualists allow that individuals may, in certain circumstances, be liable to the direct application of norms of international law, become its subjects and directly violate international law by their acts.

The more radical dualists reject this possibility, considering that, since international law only regulates relations between States and that individuals are by their nature incapable of participating in such relations, international law cannot directly regulate the conduct of individuals.

Without dwelling on the theory of the transformation of international law into domestic law, upheld by the advocates of the dualist theory, it may be noted that, according to the views of the more radical of the dualists, crimes against international law are the acts of individuals which States, in respect of one another, undertook to regard as crimes, punish those found guilty of their perpetration and cooperate with one another to curb (by exchanges of information, the extradition of criminals and even the establishment of international criminal courts).

Regardless of this lack of terminological clarity and differences in concepts, both monists and dualists as a whole obviously agree that the term “international crime” can be used to designate the most serious violations of international law committed by States.

So—called moderate dualists allow that individuals may, in certain circumstances, be liable to the direct application of norms of international law, become its subjects and directly violate international law by their acts.

Regardless of this lack of terminological clarity and differences in concepts, both monists and dualists as a whole obviously agree that the term “international crime” can be used to designate the most serious violations of international law committed by States.

Without dwelling on the theory of the transformation of international law into domestic law, upheld by the advocates of the dualist theory, it may be noted that, according to the views of the more radical of the dualists, crimes against international law are the acts of individuals which States, in respect of one another, undertook to regard as crimes, punish those found guilty of their perpetration and cooperate with one another to curb (by exchanges of information, the extradition of criminals and even the establishment of international criminal courts).

So—called moderate dualists allow that individuals may, in certain circumstances, be liable to the direct application of norms of international law, become its subjects and directly violate international law by their acts.

The more radical dualists reject this possibility, considering that, since international law only regulates relations between States and that individuals are by their nature incapable of participating in such relations, international law cannot directly regulate the conduct of individuals.

Without dwelling on the theory of the transformation of international law into domestic law, upheld by the advocates of the dualist theory, it may be noted that, according to the views of the more radical of the dualists, crimes against international law are the acts of individuals which States, in respect of one another, undertook to regard as crimes, punish those found guilty of their perpetration and cooperate with one another to curb (by exchanges of information, the extradition of criminals and even the establishment of international criminal courts).

Without dwelling on the theory of the transformation of international law into domestic law, upheld by the advocates of the dualist theory, it may be noted that, according to the views of the more radical of the dualists, crimes against international law are the acts of individuals which States, in respect of one another, undertook to regard as crimes, punish those found guilty of their perpetration and cooperate with one another to curb (by exchanges of information, the extradition of criminals and even the establishment of international criminal courts).